×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Bleach Manga Enters 'Climax' In 2 Chapters


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BadNewsBlues



Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 6262
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:00 pm Reply with quote
pikabot wrote:
I don't understand the hatred for the Fullbring arc; it was far and away the most interesting thing to happen to the manga in years (at least up until the rating tanked and he wedged a who's-who of the series most popular Shinigami in to prop them up). It wasn't perfect, but Kubo has spent years wishing he was Hirohiko Araki, and Fullbring was the closest he ever got to achieving that.


Given a lot of the unexplained plot elements, broken character abilities, fair number of sociapaths/trolls in the cast I think he has become the 2nd coming of Hirohiko Araki....if you disregard the lack of unnecessary dog deaths.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monster Hunter



Joined: 29 Jan 2014
Posts: 335
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:19 pm Reply with quote
Ambimunch wrote:

The former two that you mentioned are the definition of mediocre, and the latter slightly has been breaking through recently.


World Trigger is mediocre. And yeah, that's my point, what the hell is a 'heavy hitter' then? I would say Gintama and Bleach are on the same level - but by today's standards, looking at how pathetic the lineup has become, stuff like Gintama and Haikyuu would be considered close to being their top manga.


In your opinion you mean because according to the Japanese buying public all these series have been much better then Bleach, Gintama, and Toriko. My Hero Academia is the only one below them and it is about to skyrocket due to the anime. The Japanese public has decided that these series are better then the declining Bleach so you may want to clarify mediocrity because that is purely your opinion.



Ambimunch wrote:
Right, numbers don't lie. Everyone knows that Bleach was on the decline. But given it's legacy and what the series was in the past, WSJ should have given Kubo maybe a 6-month heads up so he could plan the ending. It's like submitting your 2 week resignation letter.

Instead, they gave him 4 weeks to wrap everything up, no prior warning it seems. The sudden news and sudden change in pacing is proof enough. That just seems disrespectful, and I feel bad for the man.


Except the series has been declining over the last 5 years and Kubo couldn't stop it. Why do they need to keep weight holding them down in the business world. The anime was cancelled 4 years ago the series was dying. They gave him plenty of time to wrap it up but he kept adding more useless stuff instead of wrapping up the story. Even if he was rushed he forced their hands by dawdling for so long instead of getting to the ending.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NightRunner7



Joined: 29 Jul 2016
Posts: 14
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:21 pm Reply with quote
Ambimunch wrote:

Naruto's recent success? All I remember is fans moaning for the last two years of its life for Kishimoto to end it already. As a whole, sure the series sold. But you can't deny the fact that Naruto's steady decline in quality after the Pain arc paralleled Bleach's decline since the Arrancar arc.



I agree Bleach is one of the most popular manga in world and it deserves more respect for the sake of "Big 3" times but unlike Bleach, Naruto was a heavy hitter till the end also fans wanted to see more Naruto and Jump came up with Boruto... still there is not a +1 million seller per volume from new Jump titles... aside from One Piece only Naruto and Hunter x Hunter were doing this...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Somewhere



Joined: 27 Sep 2013
Posts: 361
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:21 pm Reply with quote
Ambimunch wrote:
Somewhere wrote:
Ambimunch wrote:
WSJ lost its heavy hitters. It lost Naruto and Bleach. It will soon lose Toriko and Gintama. And all it will have left are small unknown series and OP. It is a very poor business decision to be completely reliant on one series - because if that's gone, so is WSJ. And you never know what might happen to Oda, he's a human like all of us, a car accident or health issue could claim anyone's life at any second, and to have your entire company depend on one person is an idiotic strategy.


It takes a terrible grasp of the current WSJ landscape to insinuate that Toriko would be remotely near a significant loss.


Same tier as Nisekoi - but the other ones are, by toady's standards. Other than OP, what else is a "significant series" by your standards then? Because all I see with WSJ is mediocrity on all fronts aside from OP.

Somewhere wrote:
If My Hero Academia and Shokugeki no Souma aren't 'heavy hitters', then Bleach isn't one this year either. And if Haikyuu!! isn't a 'heavy hitter', then Bleach hasn't been one since 2010.


The former two that you mentioned are the definition of mediocre, and the latter slightly has been breaking through recently.

Somewhere wrote:
Setting aside that I actually do like Gintama a fair amount, it's a mid-tier star within WSJ nowadays. Floats somewhere in the middle for the magazine readership, with steady vol sales that actually haven't declined too much. Vol sales that are currently in World Trigger's area. Oh yea, that's another 'small unknown series'. Gintama is another series that's not a 'heavy hitter' nowadays by that standard.


World Trigger is mediocre. And yeah, that's my point, what the hell is a 'heavy hitter' then? I would say Gintama and Bleach are on the same level - but by today's standards, looking at how pathetic the lineup has become, stuff like Gintama and Haikyuu would be considered close to being their top manga.

Somewhere wrote:
To be clear, the tone with which I wrote the preceding is less 'pump up some of the so-called small unknown series' and more 'point out that actually, you just insulted some of the series you listed'


Oh yeah, how so? All I see is mediocrity in their lineup.

For the sake of the argument, lets go along and pretend like Bleach is the bottom of the barrel, in which case I wanna ask you what else they have that you would consider an honorous series? All I see is OP, the other big 2 are gone, and the middle ground stuff like Gintama is fading away. What, Haikyuu? Good luck to them being stuck with OP and Haikyuu, it's the same as saying they're only stuck with OP because the latter won't carry them without the former.

Somewhere wrote:
The actual real, big loss that WSJ has yet to recover from is Naruto. And as much as I absolutely hated its last few years, it is insulting to Naruto's demonstrated recent success to put it in the same breath as present day Bleach.


Naruto's recent success? All I remember is fans moaning for the last two years of its life for Kishimoto to end it already. As a whole, sure the series sold. But you can't deny the fact that Naruto's steady decline in quality after the Pain arc paralleled Bleach's decline since the Arrancar arc.


Hmm, yes, you go from evaluating on performance (saying that this is bad business), then switching over to your opinion of the various series. I see that you can't put forward an argument on how they're doing on a general audience reception level, so you instead fall back to handwaving it alllll away with 'I don't like all the rest of this stuff, clearly WSJ is dooooomed'.
Why yes, Ambimunch, what you think of the WSJ lineup exactly matches how Japan feels about them, be it either sending in the survey cards for the magazine or when deciding on what to buy each week. In fact, Ambimunch, it might even be more than a match, it might even be direct causation! As you think, is as how WSJ's fortunes go! You're sending signals, right now, across the globe, to the minds of the readers in Japan.

On the viscosity scale of water to molasses, how thick was the sarcasm there?

Black Turtle wrote:
Face it, bleach may have sold well, it was never in the same league as Naruto or One Piece. Or if it was, the sales had become so bad it made the average number of copies by volume drop significantly.


Just to expand on this:
There was a time when one could say that Bleach was close enough to Naruto such that 'being in the same league' wasn't an outlandish description. By Oricon charts, that'd be around 2008-2009 (and the Oricon charts as we now know them didn't give the same level of detail before 2008). By initial print numbers, 2006-2009-ish.
What do I mean by 'being the same league wouldn't be too outlandish'? 2008-2009 Bleach was a series that sold ~700-835k after 5 weeks. 2008-2009 Naruto sold ~900-1,090k after 5 weeks. By the initial print numbers, 2006-2009 Bleach was in the 1,260-1,330k range, whereas 2006-2009 Naruto was in the 1,465-1,620k range. Sure, Naruto still has noticably higher numbers, but if you were to pick that period and say that the two series were in the same ballpark, sales/print-wise, I wouldn't bite your head off. You can puff up your chest in that time frame.
However, the further after 2009 we get, the more I'll bite your head off for suggesting the two series are close in popularity. The big difference between Naruto and Bleach post 2009 is that while Naruto stayed rather impressively stable (outside of a rocky 2014), Bleach started declining in popularity to this day.
Naruto's Oricon numbers - look at how rock solid it's been for the most part. Now contrast that to...
Bleach's Oricon numbers - look at how it isn't anywhere near as stable as Naruto was.
And since I'm linking stuff now, might as well show where I get initial print numbers from: this place. [url=http://www.geocities.jp/wj_log/rank/rank0.html#ナルト]Naruto[/url], Bleach specifically.

One Piece is, of course, in its own league of popularity and demonstrates that the Anglosphere's fetish for a 'Big 3' is a damned joke.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ambimunch



Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 2012
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:48 pm Reply with quote
Monster Hunter wrote:
In your opinion you mean because according to the Japanese buying public all these series have been much better then Bleach, Gintama, and Toriko. My Hero Academia is the only one below them and it is about to skyrocket due to the anime. The Japanese public has decided that these series are better then the declining Bleach so you may want to clarify mediocrity because that is purely your opinion.


You missed the point me and the other guy were discussing. The discussion was that Bleach isn't a "big 3" anymore, to which we went on to say that not any of the current series is near those levels. So yeah, this isn't my opinion but fact, the majority of current series are not nearly close to the levels of OP/Bleach/Naruto in their prime. By those standards, everything today is mediocre..

Monster Hunter wrote:
Except the series has been declining over the last 5 years and Kubo couldn't stop it.


Correction, they didn't want him to stop.

Monster Hunter wrote:
They gave him plenty of time to wrap it up but he kept adding more useless stuff instead of wrapping up the story


Source? Can you send me proof that WSJ told Kubo ahead of time to wrap it up? If that were the case then everything would have been fine. The issue at hand (clearly you're not following along) is that they pulled the rug from underneath him without a proper notice.

----

Somewhere wrote:
Hmm, yes, you go from evaluating on performance (saying that this is bad business), then switching over to your opinion of the various series.


Excuse me? I said not giving proper notice is unprofessional and only relying on OP is a bad idea.
And after you brought up other little shows into the conversation about the former Big 3 - I had to point out that current series are mediocre by comparison to what the Big 3 used to gross in.

So what's the problem....?

Somewhere wrote:
I see that you can't put forward an argument on how they're doing on a general audience reception level, so you instead fall back to handwaving it alllll away with 'I don't like all the rest of this stuff, clearly WSJ is dooooomed'


I see that you're clearly lost and confused. I made two arguments, which I outlined for your convenience again, and I made a comment having all eggs in one basket is a slippery slope they're walking. So I ask again, what's the problem?

Somewhere wrote:
Why yes, Ambimunch, what you think of the WSJ lineup exactly matches how Japan feels about them, be it either sending in the survey cards for the magazine or when deciding on what to buy each week. In fact, Ambimunch, it might even be more than a match, it might even be direct causation! As you think, is as how WSJ's fortunes go! You're sending signals, right now, across the globe, to the minds of the readers in Japan.


Your immaturity and complete lack of competence to maturely argue a viewpoint made me realize I am wasting my time with you. Refer to the above if you have further questions, maybe re-read what the members on this forum are discussing and which viewpoints are being articulated upon. Then re-read it all again, and only then post if you have anything relevant to add to the discussion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JDude042



Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 261
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:00 pm Reply with quote
I also wanted to point out something funny that shows how sudden this has happened.

spoiler[

Ishida: Hey Hasch! Wanna see my Schrift?!

Haschwalth: WHAT?! *Gets bloodied*

Ishida: Anti-thesis BITCH!

Haschwalth: B! FOR BALANCE!!!

Ishida: UGH! *Falls over*

Haschwalth: OH NO! MY POWERS! I'm... dying... Go Ishida. Save your friends with your ass pull of a power!

Ryuuken: MY BOY! This arrow... is what all true Quinices strive for!

Ishida: You mean I drank that old fart's blood for nothing? *In 80s sitcom fashion* Everyone: KUBO...! *Plays laugh track* Kubo Tite: Smile *Shrugs his shoulders*

The boy got an amazing power that was supposed to be an answer to a ridiculously broken and hax power, but nah forget that, that's not important anymore. Just give him a magical arrow instead that unsurprisingly has the power to incapacitate the final boss, even though said arrow is made from "silver" in power draining technique utilized by said final boss and somehow affects himself.
]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lord Geo



Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 2664
Location: North Brunswick, New Jersey
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:10 pm Reply with quote
Ambimunch wrote:
only relying on OP is a bad idea.


Honestly, having One Piece be what carries the weight of Shonen Jump on its own for the moment is a much better choice than what happened when Jump's Golden Age ended.

When Dragon Ball ended in 1995, followed by Slam Dunk's end in 1996, Jump lost ~2.5 million readers by the end of 1997; from 1996-2000 the magazine went from ~7 million readers to ~3.5 million. At that point it was all up to Rurouni Kenshin to be the sole manga to carry WSJ's weight for the next few years. Think about that for a moment, Rurouni Kenshin (which, while great, had nowhere near the level of iconicity that One Piece has now) had to carry Jump after its most profitable era ended. It "alone" (figuratively) had to keep people buying & reading Shonen Jump until the likes of One Piece, Hunter X Hunter, & Seikimatsu Leader-den Takeshi! debuted & eventually helped share the weight.

Meanwhile, One Piece is carrying the magazine when it's only hitting somewhere between 2.5-3 million readers, & you're saying that One Piece, the best-selling Jump manga of all time, can't possibly carry the magazine on its own? Seriously, Nobuhiro Watsuki & Rurouni Kenshin had a much larger weight to carry than Eiichiro Oda & One Piece presently has. I'd say calm down & don't go thinking that Weekly Shonen Jump is going to die out in the next few years, because it most certainly isn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Top Gun



Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 4778
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:22 pm Reply with quote
Somewhere wrote:
They also gave him rope of 4+ years for this final arc. This arc would be 206 chapters out of 700, or ~30% of the series.
And if you divide the series into this arc and everything beforehand, it's 206 compared to the 494 chapters beforehand. That is, it can be considered that back when this arc started up, he basically got the equivalent of 41% additional time, compared to what he had already produced to that point.

Regardless of when those above at Shueisha gave the final order, Kubo is the one who painted (or wrote?) himself into the corner over these past 4 years.

The best part is how this arc was supposedly the one that Kubo actually planned out beforehand, and...well, we see the results. Somewhere his high school composition teacher is weeping.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shinuki



Joined: 23 Mar 2016
Posts: 122
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:52 pm Reply with quote
Gemnist wrote:
Beatdigga wrote:
Don't even get me started on The Last.. I could rant for hours...but that would be off-topic.

The best we can hope for is no pairings.


I could too, not only because Naruto and Sakura actually had mutual development, but mainly because of that friggin genjutsu pool-ex-machina scene...


If you not realised since the classic that Naruto would end up with Hinata, i don't know what "Naruto" you was reading, Naruto and Sakura never was meant to happen, Sakura never had feelings for Naruto, only for Sasuke and this would never change, and Naruto just had an "attraction" for Sakura, not real love, but the Naruto x Hinata was always being worked very slowly by Kishimoto since the classic, but obviously from Hinata point of view, because the vast majority of battle shounens, the romance is worked from the girl point of view since the main characters are always dense and more interested in battles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ambimunch



Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 2012
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:14 pm Reply with quote
Lord Geo wrote:
you're saying that One Piece, the best-selling Jump manga of all time, can't possibly carry the magazine on its own? Seriously, Nobuhiro Watsuki & Rurouni Kenshin had a much larger weight to carry than Eiichiro Oda & One Piece presently has. I'd say calm down & don't go thinking that Weekly Shonen Jump is going to die out in the next few years, because it most certainly isn't.


No, I said it's the only thing that seems to be carrying SJ, and that they shouldn't only rely on it. As such, it's a good idea to keep other series as well and not boot everything else. Clear?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Black Turtle



Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 110
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:27 pm Reply with quote
Ambimunch wrote:
Lord Geo wrote:
you're saying that One Piece, the best-selling Jump manga of all time, can't possibly carry the magazine on its own? Seriously, Nobuhiro Watsuki & Rurouni Kenshin had a much larger weight to carry than Eiichiro Oda & One Piece presently has. I'd say calm down & don't go thinking that Weekly Shonen Jump is going to die out in the next few years, because it most certainly isn't.


No, I said it's the only thing that seems to be carrying SJ, and that they shouldn't only rely on it. As such, it's a good idea to keep other series as well and not boot everything else. Clear?

Well, with the last week annoucement that we got to 65% of the story, we got the time to have a new hit to come and die before OP end. Naruto and Bleach both had an extremely long longevity, even for a long running series.

And we all agreed Bleach went down so much lately that it's been since the end of Naruto that One Piece is supporting the Jump alone. if you look at Somewhere's Oricon link, you'll see that assassination classroom and Haikyu already sell 1.5 to twice the time what Bleach sells. So you can't really consider that removing bleach is relying only on One Piece, since bleach has been behind other for a while now.


Last edited by Black Turtle on Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:04 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SailorNaruto



Joined: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 195
Location: Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:35 pm Reply with quote
pikabot wrote:
I don't understand the hatred for the Fullbring arc; it was far and away the most interesting thing to happen to the manga in years (at least up until the rating tanked and he wedged a who's-who of the series most popular Shinigami in to prop them up). It wasn't perfect, but Kubo has spent years wishing he was Hirohiko Araki, and Fullbring was the closest he ever got to achieving that.


I can't speak for others, but I myself found the Fullbring arc unbelievably boring and tedious. It left a bad taste in my mouth. Uninteresting plot, lame villains, ect. I've never really complained about Bleach until it reached that arc. The complete opposite of how I feel about the 100 Year Blood War arc; I love it. To me, it's the best Bleach has been in years. Which is why I'm annoyed that we're about to get a rushed ending.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monster Hunter



Joined: 29 Jan 2014
Posts: 335
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:52 pm Reply with quote
Ambimunch wrote:

No, I said it's the only thing that seems to be carrying SJ, and that they shouldn't only rely on it. As such, it's a good idea to keep other series as well and not boot everything else. Clear?


Sorry stop acting like Bleach has been doing anything to even remotely carry Shueisha in years. It has been at best middle tier for years well before your supposed ideas that Shueisha trying to ruin it. It has been outsold by other series multiple times. These supposed "mediocre" series that the Japanese buying public seem to like much more then Bleach. Bleach is ending it needed to a long time ago and that is that. Sorry your favorite series is over and I doubt Shueisha even cares that you don't like them anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beatdigga



Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 4587
Location: New York
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:20 pm Reply with quote
NaruHina has always been fan supported BS and its movie is for lack of a better term, garbage. I will not consider that a good way to end a series, ever.

As for Bleach, there is so much baggage at this point. Bankais from everyone, Kubo ripping off Stands with Fullbring, and now all the combo platters of swords from the last arc, that it really is just unwieldy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
theNightster



Joined: 14 Mar 2014
Posts: 1328
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:45 pm Reply with quote
Animechic420 wrote:
Will One Piece send off Bleach into the afterlife like it did Naruto??? I wanna see Luffy talking to Ichigo. Very Happy

not happening, Oda isn't really friends with Kubo seemingly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 5 of 10

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group