×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Answerman - Why Does Fanservice For Girls Get So Much Blowback?


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Stuart Smith



Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 1298
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:13 pm Reply with quote
manapear wrote:
The difference is, that is the court decision, not necessarily what the police arrested her for. They arrested her for obscenity, and then th courts were like, "lol nah."


I'm not sure what the problem is. The court decision is the only thing that matters. People get brought into court on all kinds of charges all the time, and the judge is the one who decides if a law was broken or not, which is the only thing that matters.

Quote:
You say always a risk, but that isn't any kind of situation or evidence. And not only men publish uncensored doujin work or material in adult magazines? Women do too. I tried to do some reading up. Don't know if I grasp the situation fully, but it sounds like they're showing sexual situations uncensored? Not just genitalia. Very different.
(Going by mention of genitalia plus the meeting place.)


Of course that applies to men and women, that's the point. The problem is people trying to turn it into some kind of gender issue that only female artists face, which is false. The laws apply to everyone.

Rivailloli wrote:
just go watch the seiyuu events on Youtube. Lemme know how many dudes you see and hear there.


Seiyuu events aren't really a good indication of a shows demographic so much as who are fans of the seiyuu. Seeing a bunch of women show up to a Pokemon or Super Sentai event because they love Mamoru Miyano doesn't mean the shows are aimed at adult women. It's just these companies know how to market effectively. It's anecdotal evidence at best.

Trying to limit a show to any one group is pretty useless in Japan considering how much cross-appeal everything has. Boy shows being watched by girls (Kuroko, Osomatsu, Naruto), girl shows being watched by boys (Precure, Sailor Moon), kids shows being watched by adults (everything) This whole argument seems pretty pointless. I'm not sure what the importance of Free being aimed exclusively at women is to people to warrent pages of arguments.

-Stuart Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
manapear



Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 1529
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:51 pm Reply with quote
Stuart Smith wrote:

I'm not sure what the problem is. The court decision is the only thing that matters. People get brought into court on all kinds of charges all the time, and the judge is the one who decides if a law was broken or not, which is the only thing that matters.


The problem was that the cops unjustly arrested her for obscenity. That's the issue.

Stuart Smith wrote:
Of course that applies to men and women, that's the point. The problem is people trying to turn it into some kind of gender issue that only female artists face, which is false. The laws apply to everyone.


But she wasn't making sexual content, which you brought up. This wasn't material for an adult magazine, or a doujin. This was not inherently erotic material in the least. So why is it being lumped in with stuff that is?

Stuart Smith wrote:

Seiyuu events aren't really a good indication of a shows demographic so much as who are fans of the seiyuu. Seeing a bunch of women show up to a Pokemon or Super Sentai event because they love Mamoru Miyano doesn't mean the shows are aimed at adult women. It's just these companies know how to market effectively. It's anecdotal evidence at best.

Trying to limit a show to any one group is pretty useless in Japan considering how much cross-appeal everything has. Boy shows being watched by girls (Kuroko, Osomatsu, Naruto), girl shows being watched by boys (Precure, Sailor Moon), kids shows being watched by adults (everything) This whole argument seems pretty pointless. I'm not sure what the importance of Free being aimed exclusively at women is to people to warrent pages of arguments.
-Stuart Smith


Intentional crossover appeal, versus what happens by chance is different. With PreCure, they try not to exclude little boys, but they say their target audience is little girls and it's evident in the shows and the merch. It's not that the show is "limited" to any one group, it's that certain things get attacked for bothering to target a group that the status quo does not want getting catered to. Does that make more sense?

The whole article is discussing the very fact that by nature of being fanservice for women (instead of straight men), it got attacked (by mostly straight men). That is the importance of it and it has warranted defense from thus of us who were tired of it then, and tired of people brushing it off or not getting it now.

If you don't get the point, why are you still here trying to make any points? ^u^;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rivailloli



Joined: 05 Jun 2013
Posts: 562
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:01 am Reply with quote
Stuart Smith wrote:

Seiyuu events aren't really a good indication of a shows demographic so much as who are fans of the seiyuu. Seeing a bunch of women show up to a Pokemon or Super Sentai event because they love Mamoru Miyano doesn't mean the shows are aimed at adult women. It's just these companies know how to market effectively. It's anecdotal evidence at best.


Dude, not to be rude or nothing, but you are talking out of your ass on this one. The seiyuu events I'm talking about were from the event ticket applications you got from buying the DVDs/BDs, So what you're seeing at those early seiyuu events is the disc buying fanbase which equaled to a ton of women. Who would blow 80+ dollars on a DVD/BD of a show they never watched just for a chance, not even a guarantee, that they'll get to see a seiyuu talk about a show they've never seen before? A few people? Sure. Not friggin' 20k+ though I'll tell you that much. Now go and try to deny female otaku's presence somewhere else, k? Because unlike you, I pay attention to this crap because I like the show.

Stuart Smith wrote:

Trying to limit a show to any one group is pretty useless in Japan


Japan literally does this themselves. Shounen = "for boys" and shoujo = "for girls". People can like whatever from whichever, but please cut the crap that there is no demographic marketing going on in Japan. We're not blind, dude.

Stuart Smith wrote:


This whole argument seems pretty pointless.


Then why you trying to pick an argument over it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stuart Smith



Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 1298
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:23 am Reply with quote
manapear wrote:
But she wasn't making sexual content, which you brought up. This wasn't material for an adult magazine, or a doujin. This was not inherently erotic material in the least. So why is it being lumped in with stuff that is?


The judge disagrees that a detailed model of her vagina didn't have potential for sexual use. If she appeals it she will have to explain how no one could use it for sexual purposes, like making a fleshlight or something. Until that happens I supposed the judge considers genitalia genitalia. Seems like a hard argument to make, though. Intent is always tricky to argue.

Quote:
The whole article is discussing the very fact that by nature of being fanservice for women (instead of straight men), it got attacked (by mostly straight men). That is the importance of it and it has warranted defense from thus of us who were tired of it then, and tired of people brushing it off or not getting it now.
Fair enough, though it's not as if men don't get attacked for liking fanservice. Every season guys generally have to deal with being called girlfriendless virgins and misogynists. Lord knows the preview thread here alone has gotten heated over comments in the past, let alone on less moderated sites. People not liking pandering that isn't pandering to them is pretty universal.

Rivailloli wrote:
Japan literally does this themselves. Shounen = "for boys" and shoujo = "for girls". People can like whatever from whichever, but please cut the crap that there is no demographic marketing going on in Japan. We're not blind, dude.


I didn't say there was no demographic marketing I said it was pointless to try to limit it to a demograph. Shounen will generally have traits and merchandise that pander to girls, and vice versa.

Since no one seemed to have provided any proof one way or the other, making this a he said she said argument, let me propose a question. How would you respond if Free got an adaption in a shounen magazine like other popular sports anime has?

-Stuart Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
littlegreenwolf



Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 4796
Location: Seattle, WA
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 4:32 am Reply with quote
Stuart Smith: its obvious that you really are trying to paint the Igarashi case as a simple "the courts are right in the end and there is no sex ism to the case AT ALL.

The court arrested and fined Igarashi on a technicality, claiming she sent people unwanted 3D vagina scans (prosecution didn't even realize what kick starter was", when she sent nothing but a link to kick starter supporters who reached a particular tier. She was arrested and held no less than twice over the whole debacle as police built a case based on all her gallery art, cute little cartoon figurines included, all while publicly trying to deligitimize her by labeling her as a "so called artist" and a "crazy perverted woman."

The same exact 3D scan she was eventually charged for was also the same scan used for the boat which the judge deemed not obscene, so it all came down to some personal opinion on the judge and is about as defining as someone trying to make a rule as to what can and can't be called art.

But dismiss the case as nothing all you want, vaginas and penises are not equally censored in Japan. Women sexuality is publicly discouraged everywhere you look in Japan and for a simple example all you have to do is pick up any hentai manga and see how the word for vagina in text is literally censored to the point of obscurity, but the word for penis is completely free to be used as much as anyone could want. That is not equality, that is trying to remove it from their very culture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime My Manga
musouka



Joined: 09 Sep 2003
Posts: 718
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:23 am Reply with quote
Oh look, I really did trip and land in 2013!

Not that it ever changes anyone's mind in these cases, but here's some actual data for you guys to dismiss:

This is based on a Japanese poll (located here). According to the poll itself, the pool was ten thousand people, and the gender demographic was 53.4% male and 46.6% female. The main reason the poll is useful is because it's actually measuring interest in Free's sequel, and it breaks the results down by gender.

Overall, Free! ES placed second in "most anticipated" for the summer of 2014 with 1676 votes. Of those votes, 299 (~18%) were by men and 1377 (~82%) were women, which would roughly correspond with the claim earlier in the thread about the sales broken down by gender. (I looked but was unable to find said chart, not that I disbelieve it exists somewhere.)

If we go a step further and assume for fun that was the gender split of people that enjoyed Free! enough to buy it, these are the numbers we get:

The original Free! averaged 29108 per volume in sales. 18% of that is about 5260 per volume, hypothetically leaving women responsible for the remaining 23848 sales per volume. Meaning that, again, if we take this gender split to be uniform, even without guys, it would still be KyoAni's most successful show since K-ON!! in 2010. (That doesn't change even if you're generous and assume men are responsible for 20% of sales. Then the split is 5822 to 23286.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
manapear



Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 1529
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:43 am Reply with quote
Stuart Smith wrote:

The judge disagrees that a detailed model of her vagina didn't have potential for sexual use. If she appeals it she will have to explain how no one could use it for sexual purposes, like making a fleshlight or something. Until that happens I supposed the judge considers genitalia genitalia. Seems like a hard argument to make, though. Intent is always tricky to argue.


See littlegreenwolf's response. They got it perfect and I couldn't think of anything more intelligent to say if I tried. x')

Quote:
Fair enough, though it's not as if men don't get attacked for liking fanservice. Every season guys generally have to deal with being called girlfriendless virgins and misogynists. Lord knows the preview thread here alone has gotten heated over comments in the past, let alone on less moderated sites. People not liking pandering that isn't pandering to them is pretty universal.

I'm sorry, but the issue of mens' fanservice has come up already in so much detail. To summarize: a lot of male fanservice is very mean to female characters (involving groping, or pantyshots and stuff based on things that are humiliating/embarassing intentionally to the girl). Frankly, a lot of is misogynistic (to varying degrees). On the otherhand, the fanservice aimed at women doesn't involve that. It's just the guys' sexy bodies, and frankly, it sometimes reflects the power fantasies for guys, it just also happens to objectify them a bit. (Which surprise, the male aimed-fanservice does heavily.)

The very fact that fanservice is attacked is not the main issue, it's the double standard that comes up; the fact that most of the fanservice is already aimed at males and they complain when women get one show a season is an issue.

Quote:

I didn't say there was no demographic marketing I said it was pointless to try to limit it to a demograph. Shounen will generally have traits and merchandise that pander to girls, and vice versa.

Since no one seemed to have provided any proof one way or the other, making this a he said she said argument, let me propose a question. How would you respond if Free got an adaption in a shounen magazine like other popular sports anime has?

-Stuart Smith

But that's completely different. Either way, it's not much of an argument to say it's pointless. It's not that they don't sometimes have intentional or unintentional periphery audiences, but that there is a target audience and that they cater/pander to them very hard in some cases is the crux of it.

You realize most of the sports series in shonen magazines now are trying to aim at women quite a bit, to use your own argument as an example. So in that case, being in a shonen magazine wouldn't stop it from still having women as the target audience.

musouka really covered the response to this though.

People have given you and others the evidence you need, I don't know what more there is to debate about. It's really just proving the point about female fanservice being diminished more though. :/
You guys don't want to acknowledge it's for women and when you do, you just say male fanservice gets attacked too, and that's completely tone deaf and unaware to the context of both situations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
musouka



Joined: 09 Sep 2003
Posts: 718
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:33 pm Reply with quote
manapear wrote:
You realize most of the sports series in shonen magazines now are trying to aim at women quite a bit, to use your own argument as an example. So in that case, being in a shonen magazine wouldn't stop it from still having women as the target audience.


Not only that--though I agree--but is STILL doesn't make sense with the data in question.

Linked here is a Japanese article from 2012 about the popularity of Shounen Jump with women. The most popular series with women, Haikyuu, was still only 66.8% in female readers' favor. Even Kuroko no Basuke, commonly trotted out as a sort of Free! analogue in popularity and interest, has a gender split of 58.9% in favor of women, compared to Free's 82% percent split in women's favor.

By the data we have here, nothing indicates that Free would ever be popular enough with men to run in a magazine aimed at their demographic. To even match the level of Haikyuu with male readers, it would need to be nearly twice as popular with men as my previous post indicates.

Of course, if anyone here disclaiming that Free's reason for success and popularity lies with women has some sort of data they can link me about male fans of the series, I'd be happy to crunch the numbers and admit I'm wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
manapear



Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 1529
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:59 pm Reply with quote
musouka wrote:

Not only that--though I agree--but is STILL doesn't make sense with the data in question.

Linked here is a Japanese article from 2012 about the popularity of Shounen Jump with women. The most popular series with women, Haikyuu, was still only 66.8% in female readers' favor. Even Kuroko no Basuke, commonly trotted out as a sort of Free! analogue in popularity and interest, has a gender split of 58.9% in favor of women, compared to Free's 82% percent split in women's favor.

By the data we have here, nothing indicates that Free would ever be popular enough with men to run in a magazine aimed at their demographic. To even match the level of Haikyuu with male readers, it would need to be nearly twice as popular with men as my previous post indicates.

Of course, if anyone here disclaiming that Free's reason for success and popularity lies with women has some sort of data they can link me about male fans of the series, I'd be happy to crunch the numbers and admit I'm wrong.


Ahh, I hadn't seen these numbers before! How interesting, and thanks for linking.

Good point! And frankly, they would have to change so much to make it appealing to the male audience at that point it seems, so why would they even bother when they could just rely on a new title completely?

I notice none of them have any numbers actually, and I'm sure those numbers don't exist. But if they do, I would honestly love to see them too. I have no doubt the show has a male audience, but no one should pretend (or ignore) that the show is not driven by and made for women and that they make up the largest part of its audience.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stuart Smith



Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 1298
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 4:09 pm Reply with quote
littlegreenwolf wrote:
The same exact 3D scan she was eventually charged for was also the same scan used for the boat which the judge deemed not obscene, so it all came down to some personal opinion on the judge and is about as defining as someone trying to make a rule as to what can and can't be called art.


That's really all you can do when it comes down to art though. Art is always subjective. If we dismissed every case because the defense used 'art' as an excuse and it would be a far more common bailout. This case the judge felt a crude boat wasn't the same as raw modeling data which had far more potential in their eyes.

musouka wrote:
This is based on a Japanese poll (located here). According to the poll itself, the pool was ten thousand people, and the gender demographic was 53.4% male and 46.6% female. The main reason the poll is useful is because it's actually measuring interest in Free's sequel, and it breaks the results down by gender.

Overall, Free! ES placed second in "most anticipated" for the summer of 2014 with 1676 votes. Of those votes, 299 (~18%) were by men and 1377 (~82%) were women, which would roughly correspond with the claim earlier in the thread about the sales broken down by gender. (I looked but was unable to find said chart, not that I disbelieve it exists somewhere.)


No offense, but the reason it doesn't change people's minds is most likely because it's an internet poll, which is not exactly evidence. It's no different than a poll on MAL or ANN. It's only representative of those specific poll goers on that specific website.

manapear wrote:
The very fact that fanservice is attacked is not the main issue, it's the double standard that comes up; the fact that most of the fanservice is already aimed at males and they complain when women get one show a season is an issue.


Fair enough, though if that's the case then I have to say it seems a bit like a strawman argument. Some people being idiots shouldn't really be held accountable for everyone.

Quote:
You realize most of the sports series in shonen magazines now are trying to aim at women quite a bit, to use your own argument as an example. So in that case, being in a shonen magazine wouldn't stop it from still having women as the target audience.


But that's exactly what I said. Most series have tons of cross appeal. Though being shounen pretty much by definition means it's for young boys, as Rivailloli broke down. It seems like a case of an audience trying to co-opt a show for themselves akin to the people who insist My Little Pony is actually for adult men. It's perfectly fine to like shounen if you're outside the target demograph, but let's not forget who the target audience is at the end of the day. Even if 90% of the audience are adults, like in One Piece's case, it's still a kid's series.

-Stuart Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Polycell



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:55 pm Reply with quote
littlegreenwolf wrote:
The court arrested and fined Igarashi on a technicality, claiming she sent people unwanted 3D vagina scans (prosecution didn't even realize what kick starter was", when she sent nothing but a link to kick starter supporters who reached a particular tier. She was arrested and held no less than twice over the whole debacle as police built a case based on all her gallery art, cute little cartoon figurines included, all while publicly trying to deligitimize her by labeling her as a "so called artist" and a "crazy perverted woman."

The same exact 3D scan she was eventually charged for was also the same scan used for the boat which the judge deemed not obscene, so it all came down to some personal opinion on the judge and is about as defining as someone trying to make a rule as to what can and can't be called art.
As I recall, the difference is that the 3D scan is effectively a picture for all the law cares - and a picture of the inside of a woman's vagina would have to be censored in this context. The boat and figurines, on the other hand, are physical objects and therefore held to a different standard. Was she unfairly targeted? Probably. Was the court's decision out of line? It depends on how you want to define 3D data for legal purposes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
manapear



Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 1529
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 8:01 pm Reply with quote
Stuart Smith wrote:

Fair enough, though if that's the case then I have to say it seems a bit like a strawman argument. Some people being idiots shouldn't really be held accountable for everyone.


It isn't as simple as "some people being idiots," and at this point, I honestly don't know how to help you grasp that. I hope you do at some point in the future so you can understand what happens, but if after everything that has been said and you don't seem to understand, there isn't anything more worth saying at this point.

Quote:

But that's exactly what I said. Most series have tons of cross appeal. Though being shounen pretty much by definition means it's for young boys, as Rivailloli broke down. It seems like a case of an audience trying to co-opt a show for themselves akin to the people who insist My Little Pony is actually for adult men. It's perfectly fine to like shounen if you're outside the target demograph, but let's not forget who the target audience is at the end of the day. Even if 90% of the audience are adults, like in One Piece's case, it's still a kid's series.

-Stuart Smith


But that was my initial point. Unintentional versus intentional, and how that translates. The sports titles are a case of editors and publishers realizing how women were buying into the genre and becoming a larger market than before (it can be traced back to Captain Tsubasa and even famous groups like CLAMP, though PuriTeni is the other popular example). That was them acknowledging the unintentional appeal and now going for intentional appeal. As a better example, One Piece is not a manga that is trying to cater to women. Does it often unintentionally? Yeah. And Toei and co have caught on too and got smart with the merch (like dat Law figure and those mousepads). Does One Piece have crossover appeal? Absolutely. Still is not a series that is that much actively catering to women, at least in comparison (and not in the canon).

This is the case with Free!. It is for women (primarily older women), and they have marketed it as such, created it is as such, I don't know what else to say, lol. Just because it's sports it isn't for women? Except women have sports manga all the time in their magazines. That because it's a primarily male cast, it's not for women? Except male ensemble casts have been popular with women for eternity.

"It's perfectly fine to like shounen if you're outside the target demograph, but let's not forget who the target audience is at the end of the day." Replace shonen with Free!, and that's exactly the case. You were the one who brought up Free! being in a shonen magazine, and I was just making the point that nowadays, sports stuff in shonen magazines isn't just for boys anymore.

What point were you trying to make in bringing it up? Ultimately, Free! doesn't have a manga in a shonen magazine anyway, so. . .?

What point are you trying to get at now? That Free! isn't for women? Or that women don't drive the series? I'm not sure what you're even doubting and questioning anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saleri



Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 10
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:55 am Reply with quote
Levitz9 wrote:
There hasn't been a female-oriented show with an equivalent to Cross Ange's "It's not anal rape, it's a medical procedure!"


The overreaction to this scene was so damn pathetic to watch, even the reviews on ANN were sad, I feel that a most people who complained didn't even understand what was the point of the scene.

ParaChomp wrote:
The problem with fan service is that it goes against gender equality.

As for Free!, there's nothing wrong with good looking guys. In the same sense, I can name a bunch of curvy female anime characters with many redeemable qualities outside of their appearance. The difference is that these characters are never violated.

Female characters are constantly violated and objectified and it's easily brushed off or played for laughs. Where are the men comparing penis sizes constantly? Where are the characters falling on a male's crotch? Where is any of this? If this is so common with females, it should be as common with males but it isn't. Considering Japan is many years behind the rest of the world, it's no surprise.


Is this a joke? The things you bitched about are why Japan is ahead of the world,the thing is that in japanese media there's more gender equality, as opposed to all of the things you mentioned, which are rampant in western media. You get upset by it because you're not used to it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iamtooawesome



Joined: 02 Feb 2015
Posts: 351
Location: Thailand
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:58 am Reply with quote
Saleri wrote:


Is this a joke? The things you bitched about are why Japan is ahead of the world,the thing is that in japanese media there's more gender equality, as opposed to all of the things you mentioned, which are rampant in western media. You get upset by it because you're not used to it.


Japan is never ahead to any media market but they are indeed superior when it comes to tech innovation. Reason: Anime is the main int. market of Japan, fictional characters slays REAL Japanese artists in Oricon, their artists/singers cant be much sponsored globally by huge brands because Anime/fictional character rules over them, BUT unlike in Korea they're much more superior to Japan when it comes to ,media/digital sales because of the Hallyu and Kpop influence+popularity...The target market is huge and not limited( but Japanese powehouse market is limited to Otaku sales) and many huge labels are sponsoring the huge market more.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Redbeard 101
Oscar the Grouch
Forums Superstar


Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 16963
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 12:35 pm Reply with quote
I'm allowing this debate on censorship in japan as a whole to continue for now as it is relative to the topic at hand. Key words being "for now". Don't stray too far from the topic though and go off into political or social soapboxing. And as always keep it civil. Some of you seem to be getting a tad uppity. Thank you.,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 13 of 15

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group