View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
minakichan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:39 am
|
|
|
It's a nice concept, but the covers are unfortunate... if you're going to hire a deviantartist to draw your cover, consider the more popular ones at least...
|
Back to top |
|
|
redcar
Joined: 04 Jun 2009
Posts: 172
Location: Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:10 am
|
|
|
minakichan wrote: | It's a nice concept, but the covers are unfortunate... if you're going to hire a deviantartist to draw your cover, consider the more popular ones at least... |
Yes of course, because as everyone knows, philosophy is all about appearances and everyone who buys these books will do it for the fantastic art.
I'm glad to see yet more academic publications surrounding anime and manga come out. I'll definitely have to give these a look!
|
Back to top |
|
|
_V_
Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 619
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:17 am
|
|
|
let me take a blind guess: Susan Napier is going to pass off her ridiculously wrong/interpretive/unresearched essays on Evangelion (from "Wired Dreams") YET AGAIN...
...look, we've seen what the "Mechademia" crowd puts out: usually just a bunch of "and that is YET ANOTHER phallic symbol!" junk I wouldn't accept from one of my undergrads.
I hope these are entirely different people.
|
Back to top |
|
|
LordRedhand
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 1472
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Indiana
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:44 am
|
|
|
Will look forward to both, still it be hard to top Watchmen and Philosophy.
Last edited by LordRedhand on Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top |
|
|
corinthian
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Posts: 264
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:53 am
|
|
|
So much for not judging a book by its cover, eh? Besides, check out the Final Fantasy and Philosophy book. It's got the contributors'/editors' heads on Moogle bodies...
I actually enjoy the Pop Culture and Philosophy series, so I'll be looking forward to these.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vicserr
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 480
Location: Carolina, Puerto Rico USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:32 am
|
|
|
Yeah but covers with abstract drawings or just plain words would be better that those "art class amateur hour" covers.
|
Back to top |
|
|
BleuVII
Joined: 19 Sep 2006
Posts: 672
Location: Tokorozawa, Japan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:25 pm
|
|
|
Interesting. I first came across this type of thing at Schoolgirls and Mobile Suits in Minneapolis. If they get some of those speakers to contribute, this is going to be a great book.
|
Back to top |
|
|
CorneredAngel
Joined: 17 Jun 2002
Posts: 854
Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:58 pm
|
|
|
BleuVII wrote: | Interesting. I first came across this type of thing at Schoolgirls and Mobile Suits in Minneapolis. If they get some of those speakers to contribute, this is going to be a great book. |
At least one of the authors will be Ada Palmer, who currently teaches at Texas A&M...and runs the TezukaInEnglish.com website. Her chapter's title is <i>'You, God of Manga, are Cruel!': Karma and Suffering in the Universe of Osamu Tezuka</i>.
|
Back to top |
|
|
pparker
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 1185
Location: Florida
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:06 pm
|
|
|
_V_ wrote: | let me take a blind guess: Susan Napier is going to pass off her ridiculously wrong/interpretive/unresearched essays on Evangelion (from "Wired Dreams") YET AGAIN...
...look, we've seen what the "Mechademia" crowd puts out: usually just a bunch of "and that is YET ANOTHER phallic symbol!" junk I wouldn't accept from one of my undergrads.
I hope these are entirely different people. |
You're right about Napier. I've said about her that I pity anyone who sees every concavity as a vagina or anus, and every convexity as a penis. Must be annoying at the deli.
However, from what you say about the Mechademia books, I'd say you haven't actually read them, or else you are wildly generalizing based on one or two entries. Yes, there's some nutty psych-aetheist pseudo-science amazing mental wanking sessions in there, but very little actually. I find the series, being midst Vol 3 at the moment, to be overall enjoyable, usually well-written, and occasionally to make good sense and provide valid insights. In other words, more than I should expect from academia. For someone new to anime, the analysis and comparisons of series are valuable in themselves and quite a lot of detailed information is given that isn't easily accessible otherwise. As long as they are read with the critical thinking cap on, no threat to sanity.
|
Back to top |
|
|
_V_
Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 619
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:33 pm
|
|
|
...well, not all of Mechademia is like that, but they just *couldn't* escape putting a few articles in like that.
Granted, not all of them were, but including the "everything is a phallic symbol!" type articles alongside the others only legitimizes the crazy ones
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zin5ki
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 6680
Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:40 pm
|
|
|
Having glanced through some sample chapters of other works in this series, one finds the content somewhat introductory in character.
As much as the use of anime as a subject matter might cause me to take interest in the arguments raised nonetheless, one doubts that discourse will be raised over the anime of which I am a notable fan.
|
Back to top |
|
|
venka21
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 15
Location: Pleasant Hill, ca
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:09 am
|
|
|
Hey, this is the sort of thing I was looking for in a project I'm doing.
Who nows we may have a finding religion in anime book.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|