Forum - View topicNEWS: Viz Edits Fullmetal Alchemist
Goto page Previous Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steventheeunuch
|
|
|||||
People!- It'd be 'censored' if it were against the author's wishes and what not. The author/license has approved of these things, therefore it's editing, not censorship. Regardless, I don't read the FMA manga (or manga in general), but I can hardly see the fuss in this. Tenjou Tenge, yep, there's a legitimate complaint, but what exactly did the stone cross add to the story? SnowfairyX: It still doesn't change the fact that they released two edited versions, that and they are also putting out Voltron (which is an edited form of Golion and Dairugger), and Teknoman (edited, dub only Tekkaman Blade). Every company that has released more than I dunno, ten or more DVDs, will end up having atleast one edited title in their collection, more than likely. Maybe the same will go for manga too.
Wait, there's got to be some serious health concerns when there is a 'fattest' part of your ass.
Despite the fact that the changes being made were entirely authorised by Disney. Hell, Joe Hisaishi composed new music to fill in the musicless portions of Laputa. Personally, I think it's silly to get uptight over editing or alterations as a principal. When you're importing foreign media to a different market and culture, changes are abound. Focus your energy on the most 'heinous' of these alterations, rather than everything in general. |
||||||
HitokiriShadow
Posts: 6251 |
|
|||||
Yeah, you're completely right. I mean, remember when they forced Viz to stop publishing Angel Sanctuary? Oh wait, they didn't... Oh, but they sure did stick it to Dark Horse when they forced them to stop publishing Hellsing and Berserk. And Wolfwood's gun in Trigun amost got it removed from bookstores too. Oh, wait that didn't happen either... The only entertainment censorship anyone has really been concerned with is violence and sex in video games, but even that's a very, very small minority. Most Christian organizations that monitor this stuff just advocate awareness of the content, not censorship of it. |
||||||
penguintruth
Posts: 8461 Location: Penguinopolis |
|
|||||
I'm very disappointed by Arakawa's approval of this edit. She likely doesn't understand the state of rabid religious fervor in America and why it needs to be fought. I guess there's not much more reason to complain, since they got her approval, but I'm upset that Viz can get away with this kind of thing.
|
||||||
hikaru004
Posts: 2306 |
|
|||||
It's probably very easy... Viz: Hey, Arakawa. Volume 8 looks great. But, you know the crucifix.... Arakawa: Huh? Viz: Err... You know, Greed being crucified. This scene right here. Viz: Too religious. Those Christians in America will cause a nightmare. They'll be book bannings. It'll be just awful. We'll loose money. You won't be able to sell anything here anymore. Arakawa: But we went over this before. There's no Chrisitianity in the FMA universe. Viz: We know. But, we don't need the headache. Consent to this edit or else... Arakawa: 'kay. It's a tough call. Crucifixions were done. But, this is The Crucifix that may be what is referred to in that depiction. If this was the author's intention, then I'd back down too. The crucifix is common to the majority if not all Christian religions. More than just the religious right would take issue on this imo. |
||||||
Abarenbo Shogun
Posts: 1573 |
|
|||||
Or for that matter, uncut I's. |
||||||
Dargonxtc
Posts: 4463 Location: Nc5xd7+ スターダストの海洋 |
|
|||||
Thats funny and I laughed so thanks. But anyway I was just trying to put things in perspective, I hope people got that(everything I said happened) . And since it is hard to tell on the internet, it is hard to tell if you are serious or not. However I would like to point out how this mockerism paints all of a certain people as ignorant. And while it is fun to point out this stereotype these days, it is no where close to the modern version. And I am not directing this at you really Ohoni, but at the utter ridiculously that was posted before, I felt I needed to tell a true story, and a sad one at that. -------------------------------------------- Anyway since I never replied to your last reply, I must say that while I agree with you in part, I must disagree on basis of principle alone. I don't want to bring it up again because it is sort of OT, but I think you might know what I am talking about. |
||||||
Mohawk52
Posts: 8202 Location: England, UK |
|
|||||
|
||||||
Ohoni
Posts: 3421 |
|
|||||
Yeah, I wouldn't blame the writers for going along with Viz, they probably just trust Viz to know that they're doing. I blame Viz for not knowing what they're doing.
I don't know. I do identify myself as a Christian, I believe in most of the same abstracts of God, and Christ, and the basic principles he espoused, but I have to temper all that with the fact that it contradicts what science describes in some places, and was writen millenia before the science was available to adequately describe what people were encountering. So basically, I have little respect at all for anyone that chooses to flat out ignore what we KNOW of the universe in favor of any sort of fiction, regardless what book that fiction appears in. I also have little respect for anyone that turns their most core descision making capabilities over to anyone other than themselves, whoever that figure might be, and whoever he might claim to represent. So basically I have nothing but respect for Christianity as a religion, and for those that follow it reasonably, but I have nothing but contempt for those that make Christians look like idiots, just as I'm sure many Muslims are mortified by those that slaughter innocents in the name of their own religion. |
||||||
hikaru004
Posts: 2306 |
|
|||||
I think that Viz did the right thing to prevent a backlash. We have Manga: 60 years of Japanese Comics to look at as an example of what can happen if you anger the wrong people. Viz doesn't need that type of publicity. This would be alittle to hard to defend as Greed's death and subsequent circumstances allude to a very sacred event in Christianity. Let's not also forget the controversy surrounding The Passion of The Christ. Soccer moms weren't the vocal ones there either. |
||||||
HitokiriShadow
Posts: 6251 |
|
|||||
Yeah, but in the case of Manga: 60 Years of Japanese Comics, the issue was sex and beastiality, not the presence of a cross. And in the case of The Passion of the Christ the issue was that it was being interpreted as being anti-semetic and would supposedly incite violence against Jews.
In this case, a crucifiction would supposedly offend a bunch of people and cause problems. Supposedly some Christian soccer mom would get offended that someone fictional person was fictionally crucified. Maybe there is actually someone out there that would be offended by this and start raising hell and cause Viz problems, but I really doubt it. |
||||||
Cave
Posts: 80 |
|
|||||
Well, aren't you cute.
Pft, definitely agreed. Viz's editor must be asleep while doing their job. If you've seen the description for volume 16 of Prince of Tennis on their site, it says, "Takashi "Taka" Momoshiro". Uhm, no. His named is Takashi "Taka" KAWAMURA. And really, if they're going to go with the Americanizing of names (everyone calls everyone by their first name instead of last like in Hikaru no Go and PoT), then at least be consistent and do it in ALL the manga. I have so many issues with Viz it's not even funny anymore. They are a very bad company. You would NEVER see Tokyopop nor Del Rey doing this kind of crap. That isn't to say they've never messed up, but this is ridiculous. Sorry, kind of rushed post here. Must get to class. x.X |
||||||
Dune
Posts: 223 |
|
|||||
25+ pages, not bad. I suppose I'll throw in my 2 cents as well, and hopefully I won't repeat too much of what's been already said.
I am one of those who don't mind the edit, especially since Arakawa approved it (and thus probably won't lead to any continuity problems), and the crucifix-position still remains. It's a pretty small edit. There are two reasons I can think of for why the crucifixion was used in this chapter: 1. It's really, really painful. No religious associations need be necessarily attached. It is a historical practice of torture used before, during, and after Christ, and is not exclusive to him. 2. The Homunculi bear the symbol of the Ouroboros, a snake devouring its own tail in an unending circle. The protagonists of Fullmetal Alchemist bear the opposite crest, that of a serpent being crucified. From that standpoint at least, it makes sense that the enemy be defeated in such a manner. Now, I don't know if Hiromu Arakawa intended for Greed's punishment to reflect these symbols in the manga, but the anime spoiler[does so without doubt, and in a much more obvious way. Instead of being hung in a crucifix-like position, Greed is caught in a giant alchemic circle with the Flamel symbol inscribed into it. (This is, by the way, something I really enjoyed about the series; it's an innovative way to depict something akin to the cross-against-a-vampire routine).] I think the scene in question is simply supposed to provide pain for Greed. As a Catholic,I don't mind non-religious depictions of crucifixion, in fact, I would actually prefer more of it (provided that it's for a purpose and not merely for the shock factor, of course). I think Christians would actually benefit if the violent connotation returned with the cross. To paraphrase something Mel Gibson said a few years ago, much of the West has become filled with clean, pretty little crucifixes- which is basically ahistorical and sort of missing the point. The cross is an instrument of suffering and death; in light of Christ's death and resurrection, it is not only symbolic of death conquered through divinity, or that by Christ's wounds one may be healed, etc., but a message that each must "bear his own cross," so to speak. It is supposed to evoke an image of pain. Secular depiction of the cross as a very painful tool reinforces this, hence why I am not against that. The clean and tidy crucifixes of today are a relatively new thing, afterall.. ...And now I've gotten off track. I don't know if future FMA volumes contain content that merits editing, but if anything occurs which alters something important to the storyline, I wonder if some sort of disclaimer could be provided instead of an edit? Outside of Fullmetal Alchemist, I'm not a big manga collector. So to those who collect more than I: are there any manga volumes out there that do contain some sort of disclaimer, or something which explains the proper connotation of things which some might find objectionable? |
||||||
skaly
Posts: 148 |
|
|||||
I have issues with Disney, ever since Pocahontas. What dreck. It's like they've spent the last decade or so relearning how to tell a decent story. But Kingdom Hearts rocks. Best decision Disney's ever made. |
||||||
hikaru004
Posts: 2306 |
|
|||||
The Passion of The Christ also had some controversy for departing from the New Testament. As the manga volume alludes to that event and Christian soccer moms were not the most vocal group with that movie, it's not hard to say that religious groups can get offended. Some of those groups have deep pockets and can do alot of damage if angered. What's up with all the soccer mom stuff anyway? (Not particularily aimed at you HitokiriShadow.) Mothers are suppose to provide a stable enviroment for their children to grow. Soccer moms and other sports or club mothers give up alot for their kids. They shouldn't be treated with disdain imo. |
||||||
I_AM_L
Posts: 138 |
|
|||||
The cross would be a symbol and of death and viz would have allowed it if it weren't for jesus being crucified on one. Now it's a religious symbol.
Also, was it edited out in the anime? |
||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group