×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya (TV).


Goto page Previous    Next

Anime News Network Forum Index -> General -> Series Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dormcat
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 9902
Location: New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:53 pm Reply with quote
HitokiriShadow wrote:
the last I checked, trademarks and copyrights are international.

Copyrights, yes; trademarks, no.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number My Anime My Manga
omar235



Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 1572
Location: Florida, Jacksonvile
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:05 pm Reply with quote
SharinganEyes92 wrote:
Well I have to say it's a pretty stupid reason for Haruhi not to get licensed/not be licensed so far. I think they'll be able to get around it eventually, though, if this "patent theory" is valid. If FLCL got away with it, then I'm sure Haruhi can too.... hopefully.

Wolverine Princess, how are you doing? I read about the huge earthquake in Hawaii, and when I didn't see you posting for a couple days, I got a little concerned.


Well the one in FLCL wasn't a black bow tie one like the one Haruhi was wearing when she was at the cultural festival. Having the trade mark doesn't mean all bunny suits fall under the catagory just the one that is trade marked.

Reffering to the one in the link dorm cat put up.
http://dotclue.org/archives/002601.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime
crow-kun



Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 155
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:43 am Reply with quote
omar235 wrote:
Well the one in FLCL wasn't a black bow tie one like the one Haruhi was wearing when she was at the cultural festival. Having the trade mark doesn't mean all bunny suits fall under the catagory just the one that is trade marked.

The Daicon one didn't have a black bow tie and that caused problems too and Haruko was wearing the same outfit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
penguintruth



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 8461
Location: Penguinopolis
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:43 am Reply with quote
As far as Daicon, I'm sure it was the laundry list of OTHER copywritten properties that were the real problem in licensing it for domestic consumption, not something silly and trivial like a bunny outfit.

We're talking Gundam, Yamato, Star Wars, Superman, Spiderman, and many, many others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address My Anime My Manga
HitokiriShadow



Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 6251
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:02 pm Reply with quote
dormcat wrote:
HitokiriShadow wrote:
the last I checked, trademarks and copyrights are international.

Copyrights, yes; trademarks, no.


I see. Well, then the problem seems a bit more realistic, although there is still the issue of some other anime (and video games, apparently) having the bunnygirl outfit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
undeadben



Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 1212
Location: West Texas
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:27 pm Reply with quote
Anyone can use a bunny girl outfit, but I think the deal here is that this is the Playboy bunny girl outfit. Easily recognizable by the collar and bowtie, as it said in the link dormcat posted. If they can alter or remove the bowtie, I think they'd be ok.



ETA:
Here's another pic of the official trademarked outfit.

And here is the Haruhi figure again, (I couldn't find a good pic of Haruhi in a bunny costume from the series, that is weird). Bunny Haruhi

This was probably actually done as an homage to the the original Playboy Bunny, they even included the white fluffy tail and shirt cuffs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address My Anime My Manga
P€|\||§_|\/|ast@



Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 3498
Location: IN your nightmares
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:48 pm Reply with quote
Quite a good observation and point, ben. Yes the Playboy bunny outfit is a trademark and probably won't necessarily apply to copyright law. Copyrights are more like works of fiction and certain types of artwork like film and music, isn't that right dormcat? However there are all the copyrighted works that use the playboy bunny logo and images so it might be a little tricky.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime
PantsGoblin
Subscriber
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 2969
Location: L.A.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:52 pm Reply with quote
undeadben wrote:
ETA:
Here's another pic of the official trademarked outfit.

And here is the Haruhi figure again, (I couldn't find a good pic of Haruhi in a bunny costume from the series, that is weird). Bunny Haruhi

This was probably actually done as an homage to the the original Playboy Bunny, they even included the white fluffy tail and shirt cuffs.


Wow, that pretty much is the same outfit, down to most details... I didn't know we were talking about something that was this similar... I wasn't really buying it at first when dormcat posted the link, but now... I'm thinking this may actually be a problem now... Hopefully, all they have to do it just alter it slightly in order to make it acceptable.

Edit: Guess I probably should have actually looked at the links in the journal, since the outfit was pictured there too...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
undeadben



Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 1212
Location: West Texas
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:11 pm Reply with quote
Past wrote:
Quite a good observation and point, ben.

Thanks. Not that I spend a lot of time looking at girls in bunny costumes, but this was probably the most fun I had looking for material for a post here. Very Happy

Quote:
Yes the Playboy bunny outfit is a trademark and probably won't necessarily apply to copyright law. Copyrights are more like works of fiction and certain types of artwork like film and music, isn't that right dormcat? However there are all the copyrighted works that use the playboy bunny logo and images so it might be a little tricky.


Ok, first off, if I remember correctly, been many years since my last business class in college; patents protect inventions, trademarks protect symbols and names or any mark that identifies something, and copywrights protect intellectual properties, any written, music, visual, or artistic work. (Ack, maybe I should just check at answers.com. Meh, someone will correct me if I am wrong.)

So what we are dealing with here is a trademark, but it is only the outfit that is the problem as the logo is not used. But I still think that if enough is altered they can get away with using it. I have seen some really nice (or maybe not so nice for purists) editing jobs to clean up things like flesh wounds and blood in other anime, so a couple tweaks here for a bunny costume would probably not be difficult. And it has been a while since I have seen it, but only Haruhi dawns this particular outfit and I think it is only complete in a few scenes, the concert being the major one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address My Anime My Manga
Samurai-with-glasses



Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 628
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:34 pm Reply with quote
The question is: Is it really a problem at all?

Apart from the obvious similarity, and a short random article from the net, I don't see any haggling or complaining or proclamation of defense from Playboy at all. If Haruhi is as big a property as it is supposed to be, and Playboy really took some actions to prevent it to come here (for very little reason, anyway, unless one wants to argue that Playboy is even interested in the animation industry...), I'm sure somebody would catch some wind and give a real news out already. Besides, if they even know about it, they'd probably consider that free advertising.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dormcat
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 9902
Location: New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:03 pm Reply with quote
Samurai-with-glasses wrote:
The question is: Is it really a problem at all?

Few, if any, would believe that theory -- if Playboy hadn't done their share with Daicon III and IV.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number My Anime My Manga
Samurai-with-glasses



Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 628
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:51 pm Reply with quote
dormcat wrote:
Few, if any, would believe that theory -- if Playboy hadn't done their share with Daicon III and IV.
Hmm, I didn't notice the past example. Puts things in different perspectives.

I'd still find it rather unbelievable though.

Edit: quote messed up; gah, I hate this damn "anti-flood" thing. Can't make quick edits...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
P€|\||§_|\/|ast@



Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 3498
Location: IN your nightmares
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:48 pm Reply with quote
Personally, I would not like to see any editing done at all. The only alterations to anime that I think should be acceptable are subtitles and voice overs if done well. The importance of preserving the cultural and visual integrity of the artform is far higher than doing it to please some corporate moguls just so the show can be legally brought over to N.A. I'd rather see it not get licensed at all than have these changes be made. This always happens when alterations are made to anime, some purists (like me) raise a stink about how things were edited, especially if it is done poorly and looks obvious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime
HitokiriShadow



Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 6251
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:14 pm Reply with quote
The bunny ears in the show are already a lot longer than the real ones (thanks the difference between cartoon physics and real life physics) so maybe they could just take the buttons off the cufflinks and/or change the color of the outfit (since all of the Playboy Bunny outfits I've seen are black) and they'd be okay?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dormcat
Encyclopedia Editor


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 9902
Location: New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:54 am Reply with quote


To be released on Dec. 15, 2006. Enlarged DVD cover (note: link contains pornography; ADULTS ONLY!)

I should have found it a week ago...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> General -> Series Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 72 of 213

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group